[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNPOO1kj62wRUJC=yZ4qhvHaDDTpH68UQ-MT_jZU3Giaeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:04:26 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] kunit: kfence: Make KFENCE_TEST_REQUIRES macro
available for all kunit case
On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 16:14, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 03:17:10PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 9/9/24 03:29, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > KFENCE_TEST_REQUIRES macro is convenient for judging if a prerequisite of a
> > > test case exists. Lift it into kunit/test.h so that all kunit test cases
> > > can benefit from it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> >
> > I think you should have Cc'd kunit and kfence maintainers on this one.
> > But if that's necessary depends on the review for patch 5...
>
> I added Marco Elver, Shuah Khan, David Gow and kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
> for kence and kunit review. That should be incomplete, will add more in
> next verion. Thanks for the reminder!
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Glad to see you found this macro generally useful. But do await KUnit
maintainer Ack as well.
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists