[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3a46758-b0ac-4136-934b-ec38fc845eeb@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:15:12 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, seanjc@...gle.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kai.huang@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
xiaoyao.li@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/25] KVM: TDX: Initialize KVM supported capabilities
when module setup
On 8/29/24 06:51, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> nit: Since there are other similarly named functions that come later how
>> about rename this to init_kvm_tdx_caps, so that it's clear that the
>> functions that are executed ones are prefixed with "init_" and those that
>> will be executed on every TDV boot up can be named prefixed with "setup_"
> We can call setup_kvm_tdx_caps() from from tdx_get_kvm_supported_cpuid(),
> and drop the struct kvm_tdx_caps. So then the setup_kvm_tdx_caps() should
> be OK.
I don't understand this suggestion since tdx_get_capabilities() also
needs kvm_tdx_caps. I think the code is okay as it is with just the
rename that Nik suggested (there are already some setup_*() functions in
KVM but for example setup_vmcs_config() is called from hardware_setup()).
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists