[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240910040818.65723-1-richard120310@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:08:18 +0800
From: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
To: davidgow@...gle.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] list: test: Increasing coverage of list_test_list_replace*()
Increase the test coverage of list_test_list_replace*() by adding the
checks to compare the pointer of "a_new.next" and "a_new.prev" to make
sure a perfect circular doubly linked list is formed after the
replacement.
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
---
lib/list-test.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c
index 37cbc33e9fdb..e207c4c98d70 100644
--- a/lib/list-test.c
+++ b/lib/list-test.c
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ static void list_test_list_replace(struct kunit *test)
/* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new);
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.next, &b);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.prev, &list);
}
static void list_test_list_replace_init(struct kunit *test)
@@ -118,6 +120,8 @@ static void list_test_list_replace_init(struct kunit *test)
/* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new);
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.next, &b);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.prev, &list);
/* check a_old is empty (initialized) */
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a_old));
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists