linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZuCYvvjJZm3jSQux@x1>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:06:38 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	sesse@...gle.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
	Guilherme Amadio <amadio@...too.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>,
	Manu Bretelle <chantr4@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev
 version

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:53:16PM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> 2024-09-10 16:11 UTC+0100 ~ James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/10/24 15:27, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > 2024-09-10 15:04 UTC+0100 ~ James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
> > > > The new LLVM addr2line feature requires a minimum version of 13 to
> > > > compile. Add a feature check for the version so that NO_LLVM=1 doesn't
> > > > need to be explicitly added. Leave the existing llvm feature check
> > > > intact because it's used by tools other than Perf.
> > > > 
> > > > This fixes the following compilation error when the llvm-dev version
> > > > doesn't match:
> > > > 
> > > >    util/llvm-c-helpers.cpp: In function 'char*
> > > > llvm_name_for_code(dso*, const char*, u64)':
> > > >    util/llvm-c-helpers.cpp:178:21: error:
> > > > 'std::remove_reference_t<llvm::DILineInfo>' {aka 'struct
> > > > llvm::DILineInfo'} has no member named 'StartAddress'
> > > >      178 |   addr, res_or_err->StartAddress ? *res_or_err-
> > > > >StartAddress : 0);
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: c3f8644c21df ("perf report: Support LLVM for addr2line()")
> > > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >   tools/build/Makefile.feature           |  2 +-
> > > >   tools/build/feature/Makefile           |  9 +++++++++
> > > >   tools/build/feature/test-llvm-perf.cpp | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > >   tools/perf/Makefile.config             |  6 +++---
> > > >   4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >   create mode 100644 tools/build/feature/test-llvm-perf.cpp
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.feature b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > > > index 0717e96d6a0e..427a9389e26c 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > > > +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > > > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ FEATURE_DISPLAY ?=              \
> > > >            libunwind              \
> > > >            libdw-dwarf-unwind     \
> > > >            libcapstone            \
> > > > -         llvm                   \
> > > > +         llvm-perf              \
> > > 
> > > Hi! Just a quick question, why remove "llvm" from the list, here?
> > > 
> > > Quentin
> > 
> > Just because with respect to the linked fixes: commit, it wasn't
> > actually there before. It was added just for addr2line so it should
> > probably be llvm-perf rather than the generic one.
> > 
> > But yes we can add llvm output if it's useful, but could probably be a
> > separate commit.
 
> It wasn't there before, but you're not removing the rest of the "llvm"
> feature, so I'd expect that part to stay as well? But I don't mind much. We
> use the "llvm" feature in bpftool, but beyond that, I don't personally need
> it to be displayed in tools/build/Makefile.feature, so no need to respin for
> that :)

My worry was that something were being removed because it wasn't being
used in tools/perf/ only to realize later that that was being used
somewhere else in tools/.

That is not the case as you reported, so going back to what we had
before the addr2line llvm code being introduced, i.e.:

commit c3f8644c21df9b7db97eb70e08e2826368aaafa0
Author: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@...gle.com>
Date:   Sat Aug 3 17:20:06 2024 +0200

    perf report: Support LLVM for addr2line()

Just did:

+++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ FEATURE_DISPLAY ?=              \
          libunwind              \
          libdw-dwarf-unwind     \
          libcapstone            \
+         llvm                   \
          zlib                   \
          lzma                   \
          get_cpuid              \

So just displaying whatever was detected, and now we display the new
llvm-perf, so that should be ok, probably even for bpftool, its just
requires a newer version of llvm-dev, right?

- Arnaldo