Message-ID: <747b8c1c-cb7b-422e-b6a0-ea863cc37f0a@proton.me>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:12:24 +0000
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, a.hindborg@...sung.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: daniel.almeida@...labora.com, faith.ekstrand@...labora.com, boris.brezillon@...labora.com, lina@...hilina.net, mcanal@...lia.com, zhiw@...dia.com, cjia@...dia.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, airlied@...hat.com, ajanulgu@...hat.com, lyude@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 15/26] rust: alloc: implement `collect` for `IntoIter`

On 16.08.24 02:10, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Currently, we can't implement `FromIterator`. There are a couple of
> issues with this trait in the kernel, namely:
> 
>   - Rust's specialization feature is unstable. This prevents us to
>     optimze for the special case where `I::IntoIter` equals `Vec`'s
>     `IntoIter` type.
>   - We also can't use `I::IntoIter`'s type ID either to work around this,
>     since `FromIterator` doesn't require this type to be `'static`.
>   - `FromIterator::from_iter` does return `Self` instead of
>     `Result<Self, AllocError>`, hence we can't properly handle allocation
>     failures.
>   - Neither `Iterator::collect` nor `FromIterator::from_iter` can handle
>     additional allocation flags.
> 
> Instead, provide `IntoIter::collect`, such that we can at least convert
> `IntoIter` into a `Vec` again.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
> ---
>  rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> index 3b79f977b65e..ad96f4c3af9e 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> @@ -681,6 +681,84 @@ impl<T, A> IntoIter<T, A>
>      fn as_raw_mut_slice(&mut self) -> *mut [T] {
>          ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut(self.ptr, self.len)
>      }
> +
> +    fn into_raw_parts(self) -> (*mut T, NonNull<T>, usize, usize) {
> +        let me = ManuallyDrop::new(self);
> +        let ptr = me.ptr;
> +        let buf = me.buf;
> +        let len = me.len;
> +        let cap = me.cap;
> +        (ptr, buf, len, cap)
> +    }
> +
> +    /// Same as `Iterator::collect` but specialized for `Vec`'s `IntoIter`.
> +    ///
> +    /// Currently, we can't implement `FromIterator`. There are a couple of issues with this trait
> +    /// in the kernel, namely:
> +    ///
> +    /// - Rust's specialization feature is unstable. This prevents us to optimze for the special
> +    ///   case where `I::IntoIter` equals `Vec`'s `IntoIter` type.
> +    /// - We also can't use `I::IntoIter`'s type ID either to work around this, since `FromIterator`
> +    ///   doesn't require this type to be `'static`.
> +    /// - `FromIterator::from_iter` does return `Self` instead of `Result<Self, AllocError>`, hence
> +    ///   we can't properly handle allocation failures.
> +    /// - Neither `Iterator::collect` nor `FromIterator::from_iter` can handle additional allocation
> +    ///   flags.
> +    ///
> +    /// Instead, provide `IntoIter::collect`, such that we can at least convert a `IntoIter` into a
> +    /// `Vec` again.

I think it's great that you include this in the code, but I don't think
that it should be visible in the documentation, can you move it under
the `Examples` section and turn it into normal comments?

> +    ///
> +    /// Note that `IntoIter::collect` doesn't require `Flags`, since it re-uses the existing backing
> +    /// buffer. However, this backing buffer may be shrunk to the actual count of elements.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Examples
> +    ///
> +    /// ```
> +    /// let v = kernel::kvec![1, 2, 3]?;
> +    /// let mut it = v.into_iter();
> +    ///
> +    /// assert_eq!(it.next(), Some(1));
> +    ///
> +    /// let v = it.collect(GFP_KERNEL);
> +    /// assert_eq!(v, [2, 3]);
> +    ///
> +    /// # Ok::<(), Error>(())
> +    /// ```
> +    pub fn collect(self, flags: Flags) -> Vec<T, A> {
> +        let (mut ptr, buf, len, mut cap) = self.into_raw_parts();
> +        let has_advanced = ptr != buf.as_ptr();
> +
> +        if has_advanced {
> +            // SAFETY: Copy the contents we have advanced to at the beginning of the buffer.

This first sentence should not be part of the SAFETY comment.

> +            // `ptr` is guaranteed to be between `buf` and `buf.add(cap)` and `ptr.add(len)` is
> +            // guaranteed to be smaller than `buf.add(cap)`.

This doesn't justify all the requirements documented in [1].

[1]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/ptr/fn.copy.html#safety

> +            unsafe { ptr::copy(ptr, buf.as_ptr(), len) };
> +            ptr = buf.as_ptr();
> +        }
> +
> +        // This can never fail, `len` is guaranteed to be smaller than `cap`.
> +        let layout = core::alloc::Layout::array::<T>(len).unwrap();
> +
> +        // SAFETY: `buf` points to the start of the backing buffer and `len` is guaranteed to be
> +        // smaller than `cap`. Depending on `alloc` this operation may shrink the buffer or leaves
> +        // it as it is.
> +        ptr = match unsafe { A::realloc(Some(buf.cast()), layout, flags) } {
> +            // If we fail to shrink, which likely can't even happen, continue with the existing
> +            // buffer.
> +            Err(_) => ptr,
> +            Ok(ptr) => {
> +                cap = len;
> +                ptr.as_ptr().cast()
> +            }
> +        };
> +
> +        // SAFETY: If the iterator has been advanced, the advanced elements have been copied to
> +        // the beginning of the buffer and `len` has been adjusted accordingly. `ptr` is guaranteed
> +        // to point to the start of the backing buffer. `cap` is either the original capacity or,
> +        // after shrinking the buffer, equal to `len`. `alloc` is guaranteed to be unchanged since
> +        // `into_iter` has been called on the original `Vec`.

Turn this into bullet points please.

---
Cheers,
Benno

> +        unsafe { Vec::from_raw_parts(ptr, len, cap) }
> +    }
>  }
> 
>  impl<T, A> Iterator for IntoIter<T, A>
> --
> 2.46.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists