[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240910131355.8f56f86045c745cee7a97f85@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:13:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts
<ryan.roberts@....com>, "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Drop unused set_pte_safe()
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:40:26 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
> All set_pte_safe() usage have been dropped after the commit eccd906484d1
> ("x86/mm: Do not use set_{pud, pmd}_safe() when splitting a large page")
> This just drops now unused helper set_pte_safe().
>
> Besides this macro was buggy due to doing direct dereferencing of the pte,
> and if it were to be kept, it should have been updated to use a single call
> to ptep_get().
>
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c: In function 'set_pte_init':
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:83:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_pte_safe'; did you mean 'set_pmd_safe'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
83 | set_##type1##_safe(arg1, arg2); \
| ^~~~
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:91:1: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_ENTRY'
91 | DEFINE_ENTRY(pte, pte, init)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
Powered by blists - more mailing lists