linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib: PLDM supports parsing the `DeviceUpdateOptionFlags` parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <16a795e7-5cc3-483e-8c29-f8d1acc0057a@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:09:07 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Shawn.Shao <shawn.shao@...uarmicro.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: PLDM supports parsing the `DeviceUpdateOptionFlags`
 parameter



On 9/9/2024 8:03 PM, Shawn.Shao wrote:
> From: Shawn Shao <shawn.shao@...uarmicro.com>
> 
> The current PLDM library does not support parsing the
> DeviceUpdateOptionFlags parameter, which is defined in
> the PLDM specification to facilitate the transfer of
> control information between the UA (Update Agent) and
> the firmware.Please refer to:
> https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/
> documents/DSP0267_1.3.0.pdf P37.

Just to confirm this is also spelled out in the 1.0.0 standard on page
26, available at:

https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0267_1.0.0.pdf


That's important since we currently only support the initial 1.0.0
standard format.

Thanks for fixing this oversight.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>