linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/21] KVM: VMX: Split out guts of EPT violation to common/exposed function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c22f38df-0cf7-4eeb-8632-94b9b8b4a55e@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:36:27 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
 Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, kai.huang@...el.com, dmatlack@...gle.com,
 isaku.yamahata@...il.com, yan.y.zhao@...el.com, nik.borisov@...e.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/21] KVM: VMX: Split out guts of EPT violation to
 common/exposed function

On 9/9/24 18:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Paolo, are you planning on queueing these for 6.12, or for a later kernel?  I ask
> because this will conflict with a bug fix[*] that I am planning on taking through
> kvm-x86/mmu.  If you anticipate merging these in 6.12, then it'd probably be best
> for you to grab that one patch directly, as I don't think it has semantic conflicts
> with anything else in that series.
> 
> [*]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240831001538.336683-2-seanjc@google.com

No, this one is independent of TDX but the patches need not be rushed 
into 6.12.

Paolo