lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ak53ha3kltm24s45n5pczvibtltzocg33inpnro4bjeolu25re@33lae7y7qzvw>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:01:39 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: George Stark <gnstark@...utedevices.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, conor+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	neil.armstrong@...aro.org, khilman@...libre.com, jbrunet@...libre.com, 
	martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...utedevices.com, 
	Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...utedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: amlogic: Add new bindings for
 meson A1 PWM

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 03:08:53PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 06:12:26PM +0300, George Stark wrote:
> > Hello Rob, Conor
> > 
> > On 7/12/24 15:52, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 02:41:15AM +0300, George Stark wrote:
> > > > The chip has 3 dual-channel PWM modules PWM_AB, PWM_CD, PWM_EF.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@...utedevices.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...utedevices.com>
> > > 
> > > Missing ack from Conor. When you submit new versions, it is your
> > > responsibility to add tags.
> > 
> > I had Conor's ack in my mind but his response was related to the
> > squashed patch (a1 compatible + power domains) and the current patch was
> > a bit different that's why I didn't dare to add the ack.
> > 
> > Conor, do you mind if I resend this patch (and may be [PATCH v4 1/3])
> > with your ack?
> 
> Ye, both are fine :+1:

I interpreted that as an ack for patches 1 and 2 and applied these to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next
. I guess that interpretation is fine, please tell me if not.

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ