| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <303e4691-dc06-400f-8b74-6f9386ffe216@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:58:31 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@...ux.intel.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: irenic.rajneesh@...il.com, david.e.box@...ux.intel.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86:intel/pmc: Ignore all LTRs during suspend
Hi Xi,
On 9/10/24 2:43 AM, Xi Pardee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/9/2024 1:07 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Sep 2024, Xi Pardee wrote:
>>
>>> From: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Add support to ignore all LTRs before suspend and restore the previous
>>> LTR values after suspend. This feature could be turned off with module
>>> parameter ltr_ignore_all_suspend.
>>>
>>> LTR value is a mechanism for a device to indicate tolerance to access
>>> the corresponding resource. When system suspends, the resource is not
>>> available and therefore the LTR value could be ignored. Ignoring all
>>> LTR values prevents problematic device from blocking the system to get
>>> to the deepest package state during suspend.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@...el.com>
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - Add more details to commit message
>>> - Fix format: ltr->LTR, S0IX->S0ix, space between name and email
>>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h | 2 +
>>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>> index 01ae71c6df59..0ec703af16a4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>>> @@ -714,6 +714,49 @@ static int pmc_core_s0ix_blocker_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
>>> }
>>> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(pmc_core_s0ix_blocker);
>>> +static void pmc_core_ltr_ignore_all(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmcdev->pmcs); i++) {
>>> + struct pmc *pmc;
>>> + u32 ltr_ign;
>>> +
>>> + pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[i];
>>> + if (!pmc)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + guard(mutex)(&pmcdev->lock);
>>> + pmc->ltr_ign = pmc_core_reg_read(pmc, pmc->map->ltr_ignore_offset);
>>> +
>>> + /* ltr_ignore_max is the max index value for LTR ignore register */
>>> + ltr_ign = pmc->ltr_ign | GENMASK(pmc->map->ltr_ignore_max, 0);
>>> + pmc_core_reg_write(pmc, pmc->map->ltr_ignore_offset, ltr_ign);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Ignoring ME during suspend is blocking platforms with ADL PCH to get to
>>> + * deeper S0ix substate.
>>> + */
>>> + pmc_core_send_ltr_ignore(pmcdev, 6, 0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void pmc_core_ltr_restore_all(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmcdev->pmcs); i++) {
>>> + struct pmc *pmc;
>>> +
>>> + pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[i];
>>> + if (!pmc)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + guard(mutex)(&pmcdev->lock);
>>> + pmc_core_reg_write(pmc, pmc->map->ltr_ignore_offset, pmc->ltr_ign);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static inline u64 adjust_lpm_residency(struct pmc *pmc, u32 offset,
>>> const int lpm_adj_x2)
>>> {
>>> @@ -1479,6 +1522,10 @@ static bool warn_on_s0ix_failures;
>>> module_param(warn_on_s0ix_failures, bool, 0644);
>>> MODULE_PARM_DESC(warn_on_s0ix_failures, "Check and warn for S0ix failures");
>>> +static bool ltr_ignore_all_suspend = true;
>>> +module_param(ltr_ignore_all_suspend, bool, 0644);
>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ltr_ignore_all_suspend, "Ignore all LTRs during suspend");
>>> +
>>> static __maybe_unused int pmc_core_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> @@ -1488,6 +1535,9 @@ static __maybe_unused int pmc_core_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>> if (pmcdev->suspend)
>>> pmcdev->suspend(pmcdev);
>>> + if (ltr_ignore_all_suspend)
>>> + pmc_core_ltr_ignore_all(pmcdev);
>>> +
>>> /* Check if the syspend will actually use S0ix */
>>> if (pm_suspend_via_firmware())
>>> return 0;
>>> @@ -1594,6 +1644,9 @@ static __maybe_unused int pmc_core_resume(struct device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> + if (ltr_ignore_all_suspend)
>>> + pmc_core_ltr_restore_all(pmcdev);
>>> +
>>> if (pmcdev->resume)
>>> return pmcdev->resume(pmcdev);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
>>> index ea04de7eb9e8..e862ea88b816 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h
>>> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ struct pmc_info {
>>> * @map: pointer to pmc_reg_map struct that contains platform
>>> * specific attributes
>>> * @lpm_req_regs: List of substate requirements
>>> + * @ltr_ign: Holds LTR ignore data while suspended
>>> *
>>> * pmc contains info about one power management controller device.
>>> */
>>> @@ -380,6 +381,7 @@ struct pmc {
>>> void __iomem *regbase;
>>> const struct pmc_reg_map *map;
>>> u32 *lpm_req_regs;
>>> + u32 ltr_ign;
>>> };
>>> /**
>>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Thanks for the Reviewed-by tag! I wonder if I need to send another version with the Reviewed-by tag for this patch to be accepted.
There is no need for a v3. I'll merge this patch into
my review-hans branch (and from there on it will move
to for-next) soon.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists