[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd1340e4-f726-4ac4-9caa-8e8a3c369203@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:27:42 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Livepatching <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: livepatch: Correct release locks antonym
On 9/4/24 18:48, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2024-09-03 09:47:53, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> "get" doesn't properly fit as an antonym for "release" in the context
>> of locking. Correct it with "acquire".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> The patch is trivial. I have have committed it into livepatching.git,
> branch for-6.12/trivial.
>
Shouldn't this for 6.11 instead? I'm expecting that though...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists