[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fab7177-078e-4921-a07e-87c81303a71d@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:45:07 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, seanjc@...gle.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kai.huang@...el.com, dmatlack@...gle.com, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
yan.y.zhao@...el.com, nik.borisov@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] KVM: TDX: Handle vCPU dissociation
On 9/4/24 05:07, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> +/*
> + * A per-CPU list of TD vCPUs associated with a given CPU. Used when a CPU
> + * is brought down to invoke TDH_VP_FLUSH on the appropriate TD vCPUS.
... or when a vCPU is migrated.
> + * Protected by interrupt mask. This list is manipulated in process context
> + * of vCPU and IPI callback. See tdx_flush_vp_on_cpu().
> + */
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, associated_tdvcpus);
It may be a bit more modern, or cleaner, to use a local_lock here
instead of just relying on local_irq_disable/enable.
Another more organizational question is whether to put this in the
VM/vCPU series but I might be missing something obvious.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists