lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB84598499F93BD1708804B2C4889A2@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:17:55 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha
 Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Cristian
 Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
CC: "soc@...nel.org" <soc@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
	<festevam@...il.com>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] firmware: imx: remove duplicate scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get()

Hi Arnd,

> Subject: [PATCH] firmware: imx: remove duplicate
> scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get()
> 
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> These two functions have a stub definition when
> CONFIG_IMX_SCMI_MISC_EXT is not set, which conflict with the global
> definition:
> 
> In file included from drivers/firmware/imx/sm-misc.c:6:
> include/linux/firmware/imx/sm.h:30:1: error: expected identifier or '('
> before '{' token
>    30 | {
>       | ^
> drivers/firmware/imx/sm-misc.c:26:5: error: redefinition of
> 'scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get'
>    26 | int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get(u32 id, u32 *num, u32 *val)
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/firmware/imx/sm.h:24:19: note: previous definition of
> 'scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get' with type 'int(u32,  u32 *, u32 *)' {aka
> 'int(unsigned int,  unsigned int *, unsigned int *)'}
>    24 | static inline int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get(u32 id, u32 *num, u32
> *val)
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> There is no real need for the #ifdef, and removing this avoids the build
> failure.
> 
> Fixes: 0b4f8a68b292 ("firmware: imx: Add i.MX95 MISC driver")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/firmware/imx/sm.h | 11 -----------
>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/imx/sm.h
> b/include/linux/firmware/imx/sm.h index
> 62a2690e2abd..9b85a3f028d1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/imx/sm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/imx/sm.h
> @@ -17,18 +17,7 @@
>  #define SCMI_IMX_CTRL_SAI4_MCLK		4	/* WAKE
> SAI4 MCLK */
>  #define SCMI_IMX_CTRL_SAI5_MCLK		5	/* WAKE
> SAI5 MCLK */
> 
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMX_SCMI_MISC_EXT)

Thanks for spotting this. But I think this macro
should be replaced with CONFIG_IMX_SCMI_MISC_DRV.

CONFIG_IMX_SCMI_MISC_DRV is the macro to guard the driver.
CONFIG_IMX_SCMI_MISC_EXT is the macro to guard the
scmi protocol. 

So just need to use CONFIG_IMX_SCMI_MISC_DRV here should
be ok.

Thanks,
Peng.

>  int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get(u32 id, u32 *num, u32 *val);  int
> scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(u32 id, u32 val); -#else -static inline int
> scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_get(u32 id, u32 *num, u32 *val) -{
> -	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -}
> 
> -static inline int scmi_imx_misc_ctrl_set(u32 id, u32 val); -{
> -	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -}
> -#endif
>  #endif
> --
> 2.39.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ