[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240910130640.20631-1-abelova@astralinux.ru>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:06:40 +0300
From: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org (open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK),
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/ACTIONS SEMI ARCHITECTURE),
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/ACTIONS SEMI ARCHITECTURE),
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: actions: prevent overflow in owl_pll_recalc_rate
In case of OWL S900 SoC clock driver there are cases
where bfreq = 24000000, shift = 0. If value read from
CMU_COREPLL or CMU_DDRPLL to val is big enough, an
overflow may occur.
Add explicit casting to prevent it.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: 2792c37e94c8 ("clk: actions: Add pll clock support")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>
---
drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c
index 155f313986b4..fa17567665ec 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-pll.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static unsigned long owl_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
val = val >> pll_hw->shift;
val &= mul_mask(pll_hw);
- return pll_hw->bfreq * val;
+ return (unsigned long)pll_hw->bfreq * val;
}
static int owl_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists