linux-kernel - [PATCH 21/24] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_suspend() to use shadow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240911-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v1-21-f7cae09e25d6@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:30:05 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, 
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, 
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, 
 Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>, 
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 21/24] timekeeping: Rework timekeeping_suspend() to use
 shadow_timekeeper

Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.

While the sequence count held time is not relevant for the resume path as
there is no concurrency, there is no reason to have this function
different than all the other update sites.

Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme and cleanup the
variable declarations while at it.

As halt_fast_timekeeper() does not need protection sequence counter, it is
no problem to move it with this change outside of the sequence counter
protected area. But it still needs to be executed while holding the lock.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index d4a0d37f88f5..e3eb11ccdf5b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1972,11 +1972,11 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
 
 int timekeeping_suspend(void)
 {
-	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	struct timespec64		delta, delta_delta;
-	static struct timespec64	old_delta;
+	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
+	struct timespec64 delta, delta_delta;
+	static struct timespec64 old_delta;
 	struct clocksource *curr_clock;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	u64 cycle_now;
 
 	read_persistent_clock64(&timekeeping_suspend_time);
@@ -1992,7 +1992,6 @@ int timekeeping_suspend(void)
 	suspend_timing_needed = true;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tk_core.lock, flags);
-	write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);
 	timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
 	timekeeping_suspended = 1;
 
@@ -2027,9 +2026,8 @@ int timekeeping_suspend(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_MIRROR);
+	timekeeping_update_staged(&tk_core, 0);
 	halt_fast_timekeeper(tk);
-	write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
 
 	tick_suspend();

-- 
2.39.2