[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240911135141.GA629523@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:51:41 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com, logang@...tatee.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
jack@...e.cz, jgg@...pe.ca, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
willy@...radead.org, djwong@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, jhubbard@...dia.com, hch@....de,
david@...morbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] pci/p2pdma: Don't initialise page refcount to one
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:07:51AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> >> index 4f47a13..210b9f4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/p2pdma.c
> >> @@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ static int p2pmem_alloc_mmap(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> >> }
> >>
> >> /*
> >> + * Initialise the refcount for the freshly allocated page. As we have
> >> + * just allocated the page no one else should be using it.
> >> + */
> >> + set_page_count(virt_to_page(kaddr), 1);
> >
> > No doubt the subject line is true in some overall context, but it does
> > seem to say the opposite of what happens here.
>
> Fair. It made sense to me from the mm context I was coming from (it was
> being initialised to 1 there) but not overall. Something like "move page
> refcount initialisation to p2pdma driver" would make more sense?
Definitely would, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists