linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240911142822.7c65e02e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:28:22 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the mm tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got conflicts in:

  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
  security/security.c

between commit:

  3346ada04cf5 ("bcachefs: do not use PF_MEMALLOC_NORECLAIM")

from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:

  711f5c5ce6c2 ("lsm: cleanup lsm_hooks.h")

from the security tree.

I fixed it up (I used the latter version ofinclude/linux/lsm_hooks.h
and see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as
far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc security/security.c
index 3581262da5ee,4564a0a1e4ef..000000000000
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@@ -660,7 -745,7 +745,7 @@@ static int lsm_file_alloc(struct file *
   *
   * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
   */
- int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode, gfp_t gfp)
 -static int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
++static int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode, gfp_t gfp)
  {
  	if (!lsm_inode_cache) {
  		inode->i_security = NULL;

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped