[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANDhNCpAOQvUEg1SSqmdLevH6JrnFnu5qib8p7zygt8LFcCgYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:25:04 -0700
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] ntp: Move tick_stat* into ntp_data
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 6:18 AM Anna-Maria Behnsen
<anna-maria@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Continue the conversion from static variables to struct based data.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
No objection on this, but I wonder if it might be worth dropping the
time_ prefix when you've moved the fields into the ntp_data structure?
Otherwise,
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists