linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Add optional clock '32k'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2ede9457-8102-47e4-86dd-5888b6e5b8e6@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 22:28:52 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Uwe Kleine-König
 <ukleinek@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pratikmanvar09@...il.com,
 francesco@...cini.it, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: imx: Add optional clock '32k'

On 9/10/24 9:07 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> The pwm in imx8qxp mipi subsystem require one extra '32k' clock. So
> increase maxItems for clock and clock-names.

This mentions MIPI subsystem, but the IP in question here is PWM.

Are you sure the clock are assigned to the correct IP ?

Shouldn't the clock be assigned to some MIPI IP instead ?

Could you please clarify this in the commit message ?