[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuIRDGuJ-PmXfd1Y@pollux>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:52:12 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>
Cc: Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
fabien.parent@...aro.org, d-gole@...com,
lorforlinux@...gleboard.org, jkridner@...gleboard.org,
robertcnelson@...gleboard.org, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] rust: kernel: Add Platform device and driver
abstractions
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:35:43PM +0530, Ayush Singh wrote:
> On 9/11/24 23:09, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> > On 9/11/24 5:52 PM, Ayush Singh wrote:
> > > Sure, can you provide me a link to patches or maybe the branch
> > > containing that work? I also think it would be good to have the link
> > > in Zulip discussion for Platform Device and Driver.
> >
> > Sure, please see [1]. But please be aware that I plan to rework some
> > parts
> > before sending out the next version.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/tree/staging/rust-device
>
>
> Maybe the branch is just out of date? It still contains the generic
> structures for IdArray, IdTable and RawDeviceId.
>
> Has something changed since the discussion here [0]?
Yes, it has; this refers to what Greg mentioned when he said that we worked
through this last weekend in his original reply.
Things will probably not remain exactly this way, but the general concept of the
abstractions will, i.e. the existance of `IdArray`, `IdTable`, and some
`DeviceId` abstraction. Please also see [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/ZuHU5yrJUOKnJGrB@pollux/
>
>
> [0]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/2024062031-untracked-opt-3ff1@gregkh/
>
>
> Ayush Singh
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists