[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240911151642.7f9d9e02@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:16:42 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the mm tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/Kconfig
between commit:
02b4dd56f5ba ("mm/arm64: support large pfn mappings")
from the mm tree and commit:
699fd9104967 ("arm64: Allow to enable PREEMPT_RT.")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
I wonder how this would have gone if the "select" statements had been
sorted?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 3943898f62c9,e68ea648e085..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@@ -101,7 -99,7 +101,8 @@@ config ARM6
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PAGE_TABLE_CHECK
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK
+ select ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGE_PFNMAP if TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+ select ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
select ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH
select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION if COMPAT
select ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_BPF_JIT
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists