[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276142EF52299176BA3179F8C9B2@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:09:15 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, "jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "smostafa@...gle.com"
<smostafa@...gle.com>, "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Documentation: userspace-api: iommufd: Update HWPT_PAGING
and HWPT_NESTED
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 4:41 AM
>
> + feature flag. This can be either an UNMANAGED stage-1 domain for a
> device
> + running in the user space, or a nesting parent stage-2 domain for
> mappings
> + from guest-level physical addresses to host-level physical addresses.
the former part is inaccurate. It could be an UNMANAGED stage-2 domain.
> +
> +- IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_NESTED, representing an actual hardware I/O
> page table
> + (i.e. a single struct iommu_domain) managed by user space (e.g. guest OS).
> + "NESTED" indicates that this type of HWPT can be linked to an
> HWPT_PAGING.
s/can be/should be/
>
> -3. IOMMUFD_OBJ_HW_PAGETABLE is created when an external driver calls
> the IOMMUFD
> +3. IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_PAGING can be created in two ways:
> +
> + IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_PAGING is created when an external driver calls
> the IOMMUFD
> kAPI to attach a bound device to an IOAS. Similarly the external driver uAPI
> allows userspace to initiate the attaching operation. If a compatible
> pagetable already exists then it is reused for the attachment. Otherwise a
> new pagetable object and iommu_domain is created. Successful
> completion of
> this operation sets up the linkages among IOAS, device and
> iommu_domain. Once
> - this completes the device could do DMA.
> -
> - Every iommu_domain inside the IOAS is also represented to userspace as
> a
> - HW_PAGETABLE object.
> + this completes the device could do DMA. Note that every iommu_domain
> inside
> + the IOAS is also represented to userspace as an
> IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_PAGING.
the last sentence is redundant. here we are talking about how HWPT_PAGING
is created so it's implied. probably you can state that HWPT_PAGING object
is created when talking about "otherwise a new page table object and
iommu_domain is created".
> +
> +4. IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_NESTED can be only manually created via the
> IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC
> + uAPI, provided an hwpt_id via @pt_id to associate the new
> HWPT_NESTED object
> + to the corresponding HWPT_PAGING object. The associating
> HWPT_PAGING object
> + must be a nesting parent manually allocated via the same uAPI previously
> with
> + an IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT flag, otherwise the allocation
> will fail. The
> + allocation will be further validated by the IOMMU driver of an IOMMU
> hardware
> + that the given device (via @dev_id) is physically linked to, to ensure that
> + the nesting parent domain and a nested domain being allocated are
> compatible.
just "validated by the IOMMU driver to ensure that ..."
>
> .. note::
>
> - Future IOMMUFD updates will provide an API to create and manipulate
> the
> - HW_PAGETABLE directly.
> + Either a manual IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_PAGING or an
> IOMMUFD_OBJ_HWPT_NESTED is
> + created via the same IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC uAPI. The difference is at
> the type
> + of the object passed in via the @pt_id field of struct
> iommufd_hwpt_alloc:
> + When @pt_id carries an ioas_id to an IOAS object, the
> IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC
> + call is instructed to allocate an HWPT_PAGING object only.
> + When @pt_id carries an hwpt_id to an HWPT_PAGING object, the uAPI
> call
> + is instructed to allocate an HWPT_NESTED object only.
> + If any other type of object is passed in via the @pt_id, the uAPI call
> + will fail.
>
I'm not sure whether this note is still required. probably just one
sentence to highlight that it's @pt_id field to mark out the
object type? most descriptions duplicate with the earlier words.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists