[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240911091328.GM4723@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:13:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kprateek.nayak@....com, wuyun.abel@...edance.com,
youssefesmat@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/24] sched/uclamg: Handle delayed dequeue
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:10:26AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 10:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 09:35:16AM +0100, Luis Machado wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm assuming that removing the usage sites restores function?
> > >
> > > It does restore function if we remove the usage.
> > >
> > > From an initial look:
> > >
> > > cat /sys/kernel/debug/sched/debug | grep -i delay
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -4
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -6
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -1
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -6
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -1
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -1
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -5
> > > .h_nr_delayed : -6
> > >
> > > So probably an unexpected decrement or lack of an increment somewhere.
> >
> > Yeah, that's buggered. Ok, I'll go rebase sched/core and take this patch
> > out. I'll see if I can reproduce that.
>
> Hm, would be interesting to know how the heck he's triggering that.
>
> My x86_64 box refuses to produce any such artifacts with anything I've
> tossed at it, including full LTP with enterprise RT and !RT configs,
> both in master and my local SLE15-SP7 branch. Hohum.
Yeah, my hackbench runs also didn't show that. Perhaps something funny
with cgroups. I didn't test cgroup bandwidth for exanple.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists