lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5773da1f-b139-4fc7-82c0-231583636b6a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 20:59:22 +0800
From: "Liao, Bard" <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
 Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
 Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
 Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
 Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
 Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
 alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
 bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] ALSA: pcm: add more sample rate definitions


On 9/11/2024 6:51 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:33:01 +0200,
> Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 11/09/2024 12:21, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>>> Wondering if this is backwards compatible with the alsa-lib definitions,
>>>> specifically the topology parts which did unfortunately have a list of
>>>> rates that will map to a different index now:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> typedef enum _snd_pcm_rates {
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_UNKNOWN = -1,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_5512 = 0,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_8000,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_11025,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_16000,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_22050,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_32000,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_44100,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_48000,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_64000,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_88200,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_96000,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_176400,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_192000,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS = 30,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_KNOT = 31,
>>>> 	SND_PCM_RATE_LAST = SND_PCM_RATE_KNOT,
>>>> } snd_pcm_rates_t;
>>> As far as I understand correctly, those rate bits used for topology
>>> are independent from the bits used for PCM core, although it used to
>>> be the same.  Maybe better to rename (such as SND_TPLG_RATE_*) so that
>>> it's clearer only for topology stuff.
>> Even if we rename these in alsa-lib we will need translation from
>> SND_TPLG_RATE_ to SND_PCM_RATE_ in kernel likely?
>>
>> The topology files are out there and this is an ABI...
>>
>>> But it'd be better if anyone can double-check.
>> Since the kernel just copies the rates bitfield, any rate above 11025
>> will be misaligned and result broken setup.
> Yep, I noticed it now, too.
>
> Below is the fix patch, totally untested.
> It'd be appreciated if anyone can test it quickly.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi


I tested it on my laptop and it fixed the issue.

Tested-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>

> -- 8< --
> From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> Subject: [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Fix breakage of PCM rates used for topology
>
> It turned out that the topology ABI takes the standard PCM rate bits
> as is, and it means that the recent change of the PCM rate bits would
> lead to the inconsistent rate values used for topology.
>
> This patch reverts the original PCM rate bit definitions while adding
> the new rates to the extended bits instead.  This needed the change of
> snd_pcm_known_rates, too.  And this also required to fix the handling
> in snd_pcm_hw_limit_rates() that blindly assumed that the list is
> sorted while it became unsorted now.
>
> Fixes: 090624b7dc83 ("ALSA: pcm: add more sample rate definitions")
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> ---
>   include/sound/pcm.h     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   sound/core/pcm_misc.c   | 18 ++++++++++--------
>   sound/core/pcm_native.c | 10 +++++++---
>   3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sound/pcm.h b/include/sound/pcm.h
> index c993350975a9..824216799070 100644
> --- a/include/sound/pcm.h
> +++ b/include/sound/pcm.h
> @@ -109,23 +109,24 @@ struct snd_pcm_ops {
>   #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_5512		(1U<<0)		/* 5512Hz */
>   #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000		(1U<<1)		/* 8000Hz */
>   #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_11025		(1U<<2)		/* 11025Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_12000		(1U<<3)		/* 12000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_16000		(1U<<4)		/* 16000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_22050		(1U<<5)		/* 22050Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_24000		(1U<<6)		/* 24000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_32000		(1U<<7)		/* 32000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100		(1U<<8)		/* 44100Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000		(1U<<9)		/* 48000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_64000		(1U<<10)	/* 64000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_88200		(1U<<11)	/* 88200Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000		(1U<<12)	/* 96000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_128000		(1U<<13)	/* 128000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_176400		(1U<<14)	/* 176400Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000		(1U<<15)	/* 192000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_352800		(1U<<16)	/* 352800Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_384000		(1U<<17)	/* 384000Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_705600		(1U<<18)	/* 705600Hz */
> -#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_768000		(1U<<19)	/* 768000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_16000		(1U<<3)		/* 16000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_22050		(1U<<4)		/* 22050Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_32000		(1U<<5)		/* 32000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100		(1U<<6)		/* 44100Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000		(1U<<7)		/* 48000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_64000		(1U<<8)		/* 64000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_88200		(1U<<9)		/* 88200Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000		(1U<<10)	/* 96000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_176400		(1U<<11)	/* 176400Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000		(1U<<12)	/* 192000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_352800		(1U<<13)	/* 352800Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_384000		(1U<<14)	/* 384000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_705600		(1U<<15)	/* 705600Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_768000		(1U<<16)	/* 768000Hz */
> +/* extended rates */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_12000		(1U<<17)	/* 12000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_24000		(1U<<18)	/* 24000Hz */
> +#define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_128000		(1U<<19)	/* 128000Hz */
>   
>   #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS	(1U<<30)	/* continuous range */
>   #define SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT		(1U<<31)	/* supports more non-continuous rates */
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_misc.c b/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> index 5588b6a1ee8b..4f556211bb56 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> @@ -494,18 +494,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_pcm_format_set_silence);
>   int snd_pcm_hw_limit_rates(struct snd_pcm_hardware *hw)
>   {
>   	int i;
> +	unsigned int rmin, rmax;
> +
> +	rmin = UINT_MAX;
> +	rmax = 0;
>   	for (i = 0; i < (int)snd_pcm_known_rates.count; i++) {
>   		if (hw->rates & (1 << i)) {
> -			hw->rate_min = snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i];
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	for (i = (int)snd_pcm_known_rates.count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		if (hw->rates & (1 << i)) {
> -			hw->rate_max = snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i];
> -			break;
> +			rmin = min(rmin, snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i]);
> +			rmax = max(rmax, snd_pcm_known_rates.list[i]);
>   		}
>   	}
> +	if (rmin > rmax)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	hw->rate_min = rmin;
> +	hw->rate_max = rmax;
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_pcm_hw_limit_rates);
> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_native.c b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> index 7461a727615c..5e1e6006707b 100644
> --- a/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_native.c
> @@ -2418,13 +2418,17 @@ static int snd_pcm_hw_rule_sample_bits(struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
>   	return snd_interval_refine(hw_param_interval(params, rule->var), &t);
>   }
>   
> -#if SNDRV_PCM_RATE_5512 != 1 << 0 || SNDRV_PCM_RATE_768000 != 1 << 19
> +#if SNDRV_PCM_RATE_5512 != 1 << 0 || SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000 != 1 << 12 ||\
> +	SNDRV_PCM_RATE_128000 != 1 << 19
>   #error "Change this table"
>   #endif
>   
> +/* NOTE: the list is unsorted! */
>   static const unsigned int rates[] = {
> -	5512, 8000, 11025, 12000, 16000, 22050, 24000, 32000, 44100, 48000, 64000,
> -	88200, 96000, 128000, 176400, 192000, 352800, 384000, 705600, 768000,
> +	5512, 8000, 11025, 16000, 22050, 32000, 44100,
> +	48000, 64000, 88200, 96000, 176400, 192000, 352800, 384000, 705600, 768000,
> +	/* extended */
> +	12000, 24000, 128000
>   };
>   
>   const struct snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list snd_pcm_known_rates = {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ