linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/24] timekeeping: Move shadow_timekeeper into tk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240911-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v1-7-f7cae09e25d6@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:29:51 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, 
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, 
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, 
 Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>, 
 Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 07/24] timekeeping: Move shadow_timekeeper into tk_core

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

tk_core requires shadow_timekeeper to allow timekeeping_advance() updating
without holding the timekeeper sequence count write locked. This allows the
readers to make progress up to the actual update where the shadow
timekeeper is copied over to the real timekeeper.

As long as there is only a single timekeeper, having them separate is
fine. But when the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp
clock timekeepers, shadow_timekeeper needs to be part of tk_core.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index e528e283523b..e35e00b0cdd4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock);
 static struct {
 	seqcount_raw_spinlock_t	seq;
 	struct timekeeper	timekeeper;
+	struct timekeeper	shadow_timekeeper;
 } tk_core ____cacheline_aligned = {
 	.seq = SEQCNT_RAW_SPINLOCK_ZERO(tk_core.seq, &timekeeper_lock),
 };
 
-static struct timekeeper shadow_timekeeper;
 
 /* flag for if timekeeping is suspended */
 int __read_mostly timekeeping_suspended;
@@ -776,8 +776,7 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned int action)
 	 * timekeeper structure on the next update with stale data
 	 */
 	if (action & TK_MIRROR)
-		memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &tk_core.timekeeper,
-		       sizeof(tk_core.timekeeper));
+		memcpy(&tk_core.shadow_timekeeper, &tk_core.timekeeper, sizeof(tk_core.timekeeper));
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2274,8 +2273,8 @@ static u64 logarithmic_accumulation(struct timekeeper *tk, u64 offset,
  */
 static bool timekeeping_advance(enum timekeeping_adv_mode mode)
 {
+	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.shadow_timekeeper;
 	struct timekeeper *real_tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
-	struct timekeeper *tk = &shadow_timekeeper;
 	unsigned int clock_set = 0;
 	int shift = 0, maxshift;
 	u64 offset;

-- 
2.39.2