| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240911-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v1-11-f7cae09e25d6@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:29:55 +0200
From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 11/24] timekeeping: Add struct tk_data as argument to
timekeeping_update()
Updates of the timekeeper are done in two ways:
1. Updating timekeeper and afterwards memcpy()'ing the result into
shadow_timekeeper using timekeeping_update(). Used everywhere for
updates except in timekeeping_advance(); the sequence counter protected
region starts before the first change to the timekeeper is done.
2. Updating shadow_timekeeper and then memcpy()'ing the result into
timekeeper. Used only by in timekeeping_advance(); The seqence counter
protected region is only around timekeeping_update() and the memcpy for
copy from shadow to timekeeper.
The second option is fast path optimized. The sequence counter protected
region is as short as possible.
As this behaviour is mainly documented by commit messages, but not in code,
it makes the not easy timekeeping code more complicated to read.
There is no reason why updates to the timekeeper can't use the optimized
version everywhere. With this, the code will be cleaner, as code is reused
instead of duplicated.
To be able to access tk_data which contains all required information, add a
pointer to tk_data as an argument to timekeeping_update(). With that
convert the comment about holding the lock into a lockdep assert.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index be939ce3bcfc..d92b1f41ba1b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_get_raw_fast_ns);
* timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64()
* __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
* timestamp();
- * timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP...);
+ * timekeeping_update(tkd, tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP...);
*
* (2) On 32-bit systems, the 64-bit boot offset (tk->offs_boot) may be
* partially updated. Since the tk->offs_boot update is a rare event, this
@@ -753,9 +753,10 @@ static inline void tk_update_ktime_data(struct timekeeper *tk)
tk->tkr_raw.base = ns_to_ktime(tk->raw_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC);
}
-/* must hold tk_core.lock */
-static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned int action)
+static void timekeeping_update(struct tk_data *tkd, struct timekeeper *tk, unsigned int action)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&tkd->lock);
+
if (action & TK_CLEAR_NTP) {
tk->ntp_error = 0;
ntp_clear();
@@ -1467,7 +1468,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
tk_set_xtime(tk, ts);
out:
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
@@ -1517,7 +1518,7 @@ static int timekeeping_inject_offset(const struct timespec64 *ts)
tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, timespec64_sub(tk->wall_to_monotonic, *ts));
error: /* even if we error out, we forwarded the time, so call update */
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
@@ -1602,7 +1603,7 @@ static int change_clocksource(void *data)
timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
old = tk->tkr_mono.clock;
tk_setup_internals(tk, new);
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
@@ -1801,7 +1802,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, wall_to_mono);
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
}
@@ -1893,7 +1894,7 @@ void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(const struct timespec64 *delta)
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
@@ -1956,7 +1957,7 @@ void timekeeping_resume(void)
tk->ntp_error = 0;
timekeeping_suspended = 0;
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
@@ -2025,7 +2026,7 @@ int timekeeping_suspend(void)
}
}
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_MIRROR);
halt_fast_timekeeper(tk);
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tk_core.lock, flags);
@@ -2343,7 +2344,7 @@ static bool timekeeping_advance(enum timekeeping_adv_mode mode)
* memcpy under the tk_core.seq against one before we start
* updating.
*/
- timekeeping_update(tk, clock_set);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, clock_set);
memcpy(real_tk, tk, sizeof(*tk));
/* The memcpy must come last. Do not put anything here! */
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
@@ -2591,7 +2592,7 @@ int do_adjtimex(struct __kernel_timex *txc)
if (tai != orig_tai) {
__timekeeping_set_tai_offset(tk, tai);
- timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
+ timekeeping_update(&tk_core, tk, TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
clock_set = true;
} else {
tk_update_leap_state(tk);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists