[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87plp8hqb8.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:58:19 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Namhyung Kim
<namhyung@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/10] perf: Support discriminator in addr2line
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> writes:
>
> I noticed that this is under:
>
> #elif defined(HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT)
>
> That isn't built by default due to licensing issues, i.e. we only build
> it if BUILD_NONDISTRO=1 is selected on the make command line, see:
>
> tools/perf/Makefile.config +943
Yes I know. I ran into this when my perf report runs were suddenly incredibly
slow until I figured out how to set this flag.
It's sad how theoretical lawyerneering breaks perfectly fine code.
At least I'm fine with whatever legal risk this causes.
>
> And we have the patch below now, can we try to use it instead so that at
> some point we can remove the libbpf support?
I also support the external addr2line.
But yes need to support the LLVM version too. I'll look into that.
As a side note. I always disliked the LLVM dependencies, these
libraries/packages are gigantic and traditionally unstable in
interface. It would be better to use a sane small library as a
replacement like https://github.com/ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists