[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2011fcea-b4f3-a7ec-e747-6ee0195452e1@gentwo.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
cc: Christoph Lameter via B4 Relay <devnull+cl.gentwo.org@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Huang Shijie <shijie@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] SLUB: Add support for per object memory policies
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024, kernel test robot wrote:
> config: sparc64-randconfig-r121-20240907 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> mm/slub.c:222:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'strict_numa' was not declared. Should it be static?
Ummm.. This code declares strict_numa. Whats wrong with sparc64 / sparse ?
> vim +/strict_numa +222 mm/slub.c
>
> 220
> 221 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > 222 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(strict_numa);
> 223 #endif
> 224
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists