lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a608c2df-ce2b-45d8-94f5-16c830104d46@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:29:46 +0100
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Connor O'Brien <connoro@...gle.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
 Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
 Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
 Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
 Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@....com>, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>,
 K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND x2][PATCH v12 5/7] sched: Consolidate pick_*_task to
 task_is_pushable helper

On 9/10/24 23:12, John Stultz wrote:
> From: Connor O'Brien <connoro@...gle.com>
> 
> This patch consolidates rt and deadline pick_*_task functions to
> a task_is_pushable() helper
> 
> This patch was broken out from a larger chain migration
> patch originally by Connor O'Brien.
> 
> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
> Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
> Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@....com>
> Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>
> Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com
> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
> Tested-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@...gle.com>
> [jstultz: split out from larger chain migration patch,
>  renamed helper function]
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
> ---
> v7:
> * Split from chain migration patch
> * Renamed function
> v11:
> * Switched to bool (though later in the series it goes
>   to a tri-state return) for now to simplify review.
>   Will add tri-state handling later in the series when
>   its needed. Suggested by Metin and others.
> ---
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 10 +---------
>  kernel/sched/rt.c       | 11 +----------
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    | 10 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index ac60d2819bd1d..d3050f6c2958d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2183,14 +2183,6 @@ static void task_fork_dl(struct task_struct *p)
>  /* Only try algorithms three times */
>  #define DL_MAX_TRIES 3
>  
> -static int pick_dl_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
> -{
> -	if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p) &&
> -	    cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_mask))
> -		return 1;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Return the earliest pushable rq's task, which is suitable to be executed
>   * on the CPU, NULL otherwise:
> @@ -2209,7 +2201,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
>  	if (next_node) {
>  		p = __node_2_pdl(next_node);
>  
> -		if (pick_dl_task(rq, p, cpu))
> +		if (task_is_pushable(rq, p, cpu))
>  			return p;
>  
>  		next_node = rb_next(next_node);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 496d3e6ab57d2..9f07f09641f7a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1790,15 +1790,6 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  /* Only try algorithms three times */
>  #define RT_MAX_TRIES 3
>  
> -static int pick_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
> -{
> -	if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p) &&
> -	    cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_mask))
> -		return 1;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Return the highest pushable rq's task, which is suitable to be executed
>   * on the CPU, NULL otherwise
> @@ -1812,7 +1803,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_highest_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	plist_for_each_entry(p, head, pushable_tasks) {
> -		if (pick_rt_task(rq, p, cpu))
> +		if (task_is_pushable(rq, p, cpu))
>  			return p;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index d2cc31c2457e5..10ef612c078f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -3586,6 +3586,16 @@ void move_queued_task_locked(struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *dst_rq, struct task_s
>  	set_task_cpu(task, dst_rq->cpu);
>  	activate_task(dst_rq, task, 0);
>  }
> +
> +static inline
> +bool task_is_pushable(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
> +{
> +	if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p) &&
> +	    cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_mask))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}

The slightly awkward
if (condition)
	return true;
return false;

is more convenient for you for the tri-state later, I assume.
Fine by me FWIW.
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ