[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8068130ce4ece6078b2893c4c6333c06c792b6c0.camel@kylinos.cn>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:21:26 +0800
From: duanchenghao <duanchenghao@...inos.cn>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pavel@....cz, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
niko.mauno@...sala.com, stanley_chang@...ltek.com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: Fix the issue of task recovery failure caused by
USB status when S4 wakes up
在 2024-09-11星期三的 10:40 -0400,Alan Stern写道:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:36:56PM +0800, duanchenghao wrote:
> > S4 wakeup restores the image that was saved before the system
> > entered
> > the S4 sleep state.
> >
> > S4 waking up from hibernation
> > =============================
> > kernel initialization
> > |
> > v
> > freeze user task and kernel thread
> > |
> > v
> > load saved image
> > |
> > v
> > freeze the peripheral device and controller
> > (Check the HCD_FLAG_WAKEUP_ PENDING flag of the USB. If it is
> > set,
> > return to EBUSY and do not perform the following restore
> > image.)
>
> Why is the flag set at this point? It should not be; the device and
> controller should have been frozen with wakeup disabled.
>
This is check point, not set point. When the USB goes into a suspend
state, the HCD_FLAG_WAKEUP_PENDING flag is checked, and if it is found
that the USB is in the process of resuming, then an EBUSY error is
returned.
> > |
> > v
> > restore image(task recovery)
>
> > > > However, upon detecting that the hcd is in the
> > > > HCD_FLAG_WAKEUP_PENDING state,
> > > > it will return an EBUSY status, causing the S4 suspend to fail
> > > > and
> > > > subsequent task recovery to not proceed.
> > >
> > > What will return an EBUSY status?
> >
> > if HCD_FLAG_WAKEUP_PENDING flag is set_bit, will return EBUSY.
>
> I meant: Which function will return EBUSY status? The answer is in
> the
> log below; hcd_pci_suspend() does this.
>
> > > Why do you say that S4 suspend will fail? Aren't you talking
> > > about
> > > S4
> > > wakeup?
> >
> > After returning EBUSY, the subsequent restore image operation will
> > not
> > be executed.
> >
> > >
> > > Can you provide a kernel log that explains these points and shows
> > > what
> > > problem you are trying to solve?
> >
> > [ 9.009166][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image signature found, resuming
> > [ 9.009167][ 2] [ T403] PM: resume from hibernation
> > [ 9.009243][ 2] [ T403] inno-codec inno-codec.16.auto:
> > [inno_vpu][vpu_notifier:1540]vpu_notifier: untested action 5...
> > [ 9.009244][ 2] [ T403] Freezing user space processes ...
> > (elapsed
> > 0.001 seconds) done.
> > [ 9.010355][ 2] [ T403] OOM killer disabled.
> > [ 9.010355][ 2] [ T403] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
> > (elapsed 0.000 seconds) done.
> > [ 9.012152][ 2] [ T403] PM: Basic memory bitmaps created
> > [ 9.073333][ 2] [ T403] PM: Using 3 thread(s) for decompression
> > [ 9.073334][ 2] [ T403] PM: Loading and decompressing image
> > data
> > (486874 pages)...
> > [ 9.073335][ 2] [ T403] hibernate: Hibernated on CPU 0
> > [mpidr:0x0]
> > [ 9.095928][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 0%
> > [ 9.664803][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 10%
> > [ 9.794156][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 20%
> > [ 9.913001][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 30%
> > [ 10.034331][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 40%
> > [ 10.154070][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 50%
> > [ 10.277096][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 60%
> > [ 10.398860][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 70%
> > [ 10.533760][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 80%
> > [ 10.659874][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 90%
> > [ 10.760681][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading progress: 100%
> > [ 10.760693][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image loading done
> > [ 10.760718][ 2] [ T403] PM: Read 1947496 kbytes in 1.68 seconds
> > (1159.22 MB/s)
> > [ 10.761982][ 2] [ T403] PM: Image successfully loaded
> > [ 10.761988][ 2] [ T403] printk: Suspending console(s) (use
> > no_console_suspend to debug)
> > [ 10.864973][ 2] [ T403] innovpu_freeze:1782
> > [ 10.864974][ 2] [ T403] innovpu_suspend:1759
> > [ 11.168871][ 2] [ T189] PM: pci_pm_freeze():
> > hcd_pci_suspend+0x0/0x38 returns -16
>
> This should not be allowed to happen. Freezing is mandatory and not
> subject to wakeup requests.
>
> Is your problem related to the one discussed in this email thread?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/d8600868-6e4b-45ab-b328-852b6ac8ecb5@rowland.harvard.edu/
>
> Would the suggestion I made there -- i.e., have the xhci-hcd
> interrupt handler skip calling usb_hcd_resume_root_hub() if the root
> hub
> was suspended with wakeup = 0 -- fix your problem?
Skipping usb_hcd_resume_root_hub() should generally be possible, but
it's important to ensure that normal remote wakeup functionality is not
compromised. Is it HUB_SUSPEND that the hub you are referring to is in
a suspended state?
v2 patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910105714.148976-1-duanchenghao@kylinos.cn/
>
> Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists