| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240912231650.3740732-21-debug@rivosinc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:16:39 -0700
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
To: paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...ive.com,
conor@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: corbet@....net,
palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arnd@...db.de,
ebiederm@...ssion.com,
kees@...nel.org,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
brauner@...nel.org,
samuel.holland@...ive.com,
debug@...osinc.com,
andy.chiu@...ive.com,
jerry.shih@...ive.com,
greentime.hu@...ive.com,
charlie@...osinc.com,
evan@...osinc.com,
cleger@...osinc.com,
xiao.w.wang@...el.com,
ajones@...tanamicro.com,
anup@...infault.org,
mchitale@...tanamicro.com,
atishp@...osinc.com,
sameo@...osinc.com,
bjorn@...osinc.com,
alexghiti@...osinc.com,
david@...hat.com,
libang.li@...group.com,
jszhang@...nel.org,
leobras@...hat.com,
guoren@...nel.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com,
songshuaishuai@...ylab.org,
costa.shul@...hat.com,
bhe@...hat.com,
zong.li@...ive.com,
puranjay@...nel.org,
namcaov@...il.com,
antonb@...storrent.com,
sorear@...tmail.com,
quic_bjorande@...cinc.com,
ancientmodern4@...il.com,
ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk,
quic_zhonhan@...cinc.com,
cuiyunhui@...edance.com,
yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com,
ke.zhao@...ngroup.cn,
sunilvl@...tanamicro.com,
tanzhasanwork@...il.com,
schwab@...e.de,
dawei.li@...ngroup.cn,
rppt@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org,
usama.anjum@...labora.com,
osalvador@...e.de,
ryan.roberts@....com,
andrii@...nel.org,
alx@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com,
broonie@...nel.org,
revest@...omium.org,
bgray@...ux.ibm.com,
deller@....de,
zev@...ilderbeest.net
Subject: [PATCH v4 20/30] riscv: Implements arch agnostic indirect branch tracking prctls
prctls implemented are:
PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS, PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS and
PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 28 +++++++++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 5 +++
arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
index 6d806fbb283d..20a9102cce51 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
@@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ struct kernel_clone_args;
struct cfi_status {
unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */
unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1;
- unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 2);
+ unsigned long ufcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for forward cfi. Note that ELP goes in sstatus */
+ unsigned long ufcfi_locked : 1;
+ unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long)*8) - 4);
unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */
unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */
unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */
@@ -33,6 +35,10 @@ bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task);
bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task);
void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task);
void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable);
+bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task);
+bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task);
+void set_indir_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable);
+void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task);
#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE)
@@ -90,6 +96,26 @@ static inline void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable)
}
+static inline bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline void set_indir_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable)
+{
+
+}
+
+void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
index b64baa0235ea..f3c5b8f2c869 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
@@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
set_shstk_status(current, false);
set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0);
set_active_shstk(current, 0);
+ /*
+ * disable indirect branch tracking on exec.
+ * libc will enable it later via prctl.
+ */
+ set_indir_lp_status(current, false);
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
regs->status &= ~SR_UXL;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
index c77abe552c88..8da509afdbe9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
@@ -69,6 +69,32 @@ void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task)
task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked = 1;
}
+bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_en ? true : false;
+}
+
+bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_locked ? true : false;
+}
+
+void set_indir_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable)
+{
+ task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_en = enable ? 1 : 0;
+
+ if (enable)
+ task->thread_info.envcfg |= ENVCFG_LPE;
+ else
+ task->thread_info.envcfg &= ~ENVCFG_LPE;
+
+ csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread_info.envcfg);
+}
+
+void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_locked = 1;
+}
/*
* If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as
* regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back
@@ -371,3 +397,53 @@ int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task,
return 0;
}
+
+int arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status)
+{
+ unsigned long fcfi_status = 0;
+
+ if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* indirect branch tracking is enabled on the task or not */
+ fcfi_status |= (is_indir_lp_enabled(t) ? PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE : 0);
+
+ return copy_to_user(status, &fcfi_status, sizeof(fcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
+}
+
+int arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status)
+{
+ bool enable_indir_lp = false;
+
+ if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* indirect branch tracking is locked and further can't be modified by user */
+ if (is_indir_lp_locked(t))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Reject unknown flags */
+ if (status & ~PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ enable_indir_lp = (status & PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE) ? true : false;
+ set_indir_lp_status(t, enable_indir_lp);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *task,
+ unsigned long arg)
+{
+ /*
+ * If indirect branch tracking is not supported or not enabled on task,
+ * nothing to lock here
+ */
+ if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr() ||
+ !is_indir_lp_enabled(task))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ set_indir_lp_lock(task);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.45.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists