[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuKKMIz2OuL8UbgS@HYD-DK-UNGSW21.microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:59:04 +0530
From: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
<Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/5] net: lan743x: Add SFP support check flag
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for review the patches.
The 09/11/2024 19:06, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> > + if (adapter->is_pci11x1x && !adapter->is_sgmii_en &&
> > + adapter->is_sfp_support_en) {
> > + netif_err(adapter, drv, adapter->netdev,
> > + "Invalid eeprom cfg: sfp enabled with sgmii disabled");
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> is_sgmii_en actually means PCS? An SFP might need 1000BaseX or SGMII,
No, not really.
The PCI11010/PCI1414 chip can support either an RGMII interface or
an SGMII/1000Base-X/2500Base-X interface.
To differentiate between these interfaces, we need to enable or disable
the SGMII/1000Base-X/2500Base-X interface in the EEPROM.
This configuration is reflected in the STRAP_READ register (0x0C),
specifically bit 6.
According to the datasheet,
the "Strap Register (STRAP)" bit 6 is described as "SGMII_EN_STRAP"
Therefore, the flag is named "is_sgmii_en".
> phylink will tell you the mode to put the PCS into.
Yes. You are correct.
Based on PCS information, it will swich between SGMII or 1000Base-X or
2500Base-X I/F.
>
> Andrew
--
Thanks,
Raju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists