linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next V2 5/5] net: lan743x: Add Support for 2.5G SFP with 2500Base-X Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZuKSZEXDXYH9/zjW@HYD-DK-UNGSW21.microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:34:04 +0530
From: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	<Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 5/5] net: lan743x: Add Support for 2.5G SFP
 with 2500Base-X Interface

Hi Andrew,

The 09/11/2024 19:31, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> > @@ -3359,6 +3362,7 @@ static int lan743x_phylink_create(struct lan743x_adapter *adapter)
> >       lan743x_phy_interface_select(adapter);
> >
> >       switch (adapter->phy_interface) {
> > +     case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
> >       case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
> >               __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII,
> >                         adapter->phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
> 
> I _think_ you also need to set the PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX bit in
> phylink_config.supported_interfaces if you actually support it.
> 
It's already add support. Here it's showing only diff changes

> Have you tested an SFP module capable of 2500BASEX?
> 
Yes. I test SFP module (FS's make 2.5G Cu SFP (SFP-2.5G-T))
it's working as expected.

>         Andrew

-- 
Thanks,                                                                         
Raju