[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLszTgYrEk=UBd6zgesphC+rLPtkOG4fjBOYaGRQXYLNUomyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:58:21 -0600
From: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
To: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
Cc: u-boot@...ts.denx.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/30] drivers/arm: Implement acpi_fill_madt
Hi Patrick,
On Wed, 11 Sept 2024 at 00:25, Patrick Rudolph
<patrick.rudolph@...ements.com> wrote:
>
> Fill the MADT table in the GIC driver and armv8 CPU driver to
> drop SoC specific code. While the GIC only needs devicetree
> data, the CPU driver needs additional information stored in
> the cpu_plat struct.
>
> While on it update the only board making use of the existing
> drivers and writing ACPI MADT in mainboard code.
>
> TEST: Booted on QEMU sbsa using driver model generated MADT.
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/lib/acpi_table.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/lib/gic-v3-its.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cpu/armv8_cpu.c | 27 ++++++++++++
> include/cpu.h | 27 +++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
Are the GIC values available by probing, or are they just 'known', and
dependent on the compatible string?
Regards,
Simon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists