[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e19fc109-9711-4a3d-9aaf-4a7159946a2b@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:32:03 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Zero utp_upiu_req at the beginning of each
command
On 9/10/24 10:39 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
> +static void zero_utp_upiu(struct utp_upiu_req *req)
> +{
> + memset(&req->utp_upiu, 0, sizeof(req->utp_upiu));
> +}
Introducing a function that only calls memset() seems like overkill to
me. Please call memset() directly.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h
> index 8c29e498ef98..b0d60d54d6c9 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h
> @@ -162,11 +162,13 @@ struct utp_upiu_cmd {
> */
> struct utp_upiu_req {
> struct utp_upiu_header header;
> - union {
> - struct utp_upiu_cmd sc;
> - struct utp_upiu_query qr;
> - struct utp_upiu_query uc;
> - };
> + struct_group(utp_upiu,
> + union {
> + struct utp_upiu_cmd sc;
> + struct utp_upiu_query qr;
> + struct utp_upiu_query uc;
> + };
> + );
> };
Is the above change perhaps independent of the rest of this patch? I
think that this change can be left out.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists