linux-kernel - Re: [RFC net-next v3 6/9] netdev-genl: Support setting per-NAPI config values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZuLErUy3j6KpswM-@LQ3V64L9R2.homenet.telecomitalia.it>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:38:37 +0200
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mkarsten@...terloo.ca, kuba@...nel.org, skhawaja@...gle.com,
	sdf@...ichev.me, bjorn@...osinc.com, amritha.nambiar@...el.com,
	sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>,
	Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v3 6/9] netdev-genl: Support setting per-NAPI
 config values

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:07:14AM +0000, Joe Damato wrote:
> Add support to set per-NAPI defer_hard_irqs and gro_flush_timeout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml | 11 ++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/netdev.h             |  1 +
>  net/core/netdev-genl-gen.c              | 14 ++++++++
>  net/core/netdev-genl-gen.h              |  1 +
>  net/core/netdev-genl.c                  | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/netdev.h       |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 73 insertions(+)

My apologies; there's a few merge conflicts with this patch against
the latest net-next/main. I pulled recently, but it looks like
Mina's work got merged (which is excellent news) after I pulled and
so my patch won't apply cleanly.

I can wait the 48 hours to resend or simply reply with an updated
patch 6 in the body of my message, as this is only an RFC.

Let me know what works easiest for anyone who wants to actually test
this (vs just review it).

Sorry about that; should have pulled this morning before sending :)

- Joe