[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2aa1d3ff-bc9b-4c1f-a6d7-5673981d0ed6@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:55:34 +0300
From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@....com>,
Bogdan-Gabriel Roman <bogdan-gabriel.roman@....com>,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: add schema for NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoCs
On 9/11/2024 9:22 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:00:25AM +0300, Ciprian Costea wrote:
>> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com>
>>
>> This patch adds the dt-bindings for NXP S32G2/S32G3 SoCs RTC driver.
>
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + const: nxp,s32g-rtc
>
> Also, how come there are not specific compatibles for the two SoCs
> supported here?
Hello Conor,
The RTC module is the same for S32G2 and S32G3 SoCs.
Therefore, I did not wanted to add two compatible strings
('nxp,s32g2-rtc' and 'nxp,s32g3-rtc') when there is no actual difference
which they could target.
Furthermore, in the future I plan to refactor the common part from [1]
and [2] files into 's32g.dtsi'. Maybe then such common compatible
strings would make more sense.
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g2.dtsi
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g3.dtsi
Regards,
Ciprian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists