linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] posix-timers: Check timespec64 before call clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874j6l9ixk.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:04:55 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, Richard Cochran
 <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
 frederic@...nel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, mbenes@...e.cz,
 jstultz@...gle.com, andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] posix-timers: Check timespec64 before call
 clock_set()

On Thu, Sep 12 2024 at 10:53, Jinjie Ruan wrote:

> On 2024/9/9 23:19, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 03:41:23PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>>> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>>> index 1cc830ef93a7..34deec619e17 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
>>> @@ -1137,6 +1137,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime, const clockid_t, which_clock,
>>>  	if (get_timespec64(&new_tp, tp))
>>>  		return -EFAULT;
>>>  
>>> +	if (!timespec64_valid(&new_tp))
>>> +		return -ERANGE;
>> 
>> Why not use timespec64_valid_settod()?
>
> There was already checks in following code, so it is not necessary to
> check NULL or timespec64_valid() in ptp core and its drivers, only the
> second patch is needed.
>
> 169 int do_sys_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *tv, const struct
> timezone *tz)
>  170 {
>  171 >-------static int firsttime = 1;
>  172 >-------int error = 0;
>  173
>  174 >-------if (tv && !timespec64_valid_settod(tv))
>  175 >------->-------return -EINVAL;

How does this code validate timespecs for clock_settime(clockid) where
clockid != CLOCK_REALTIME?

Thanks,

        tglx