[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7e5c452c-61ec-421f-bd87-506d66a58f55@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:08:37 +0000
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>, "Olof Johansson" <olof@...om.net>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the sound-asoc tree
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024, at 11:07, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 02:44:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
>> (but the same patch):
>>
>> 7817eb1ad353 ("ASoC: dt-bindings: cirrus,cs4271: Convert to dtschema")
>>
>> This is commit
>>
>> cf700e558e1d ("ASoC: dt-bindings: cirrus,cs4271: Convert to dtschema")
>>
>> from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I wonder how that ended up in the arm-soc tree... anyway, shouldn't
> matter if it's the same.
I merged the entire ep93xx DT conversion series in one branch
that I plan to send as a separate pull request after the normal
soc/dt, soc/drivers etc branches, in order to finally get the
work done.
This patch it not needed for bisecting through the series, so
I've now dropped it again.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists