| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e77a06ff-0f67-456f-9a1d-34570e9b7509@126.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:44:23 +0800
From: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomzhao@....com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn>
Cc: jack@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] udf: return EIO when ftrunctate access beyond end of
device
On 2024/9/12 19:12, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 12-09-24 14:16:52, Zhao Mengmeng wrote:
>> syzbot reports a udf slab-out-of-bounds as blow:
>>
>> loop0: rw=0, sector=117, nr_sectors = 1 limit=0
>> syz-executor135: attempt to access beyond end of device
>> loop0: rw=0, sector=117, nr_sectors = 1 limit=0
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in udf_get_filelongad+0x167/0x1b0 fs/udf/directory.c:526
>> Read of size 4 at addr ffff888012113f30 by task syz-executor135/5106
>>
>> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5106 Comm: syz-executor135 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
>> dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
>> print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]
>> print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488
>> kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601
>> udf_get_filelongad+0x167/0x1b0 fs/udf/directory.c:526
>> udf_current_aext+0x435/0x9e0 fs/udf/inode.c:2235
>> udf_next_aext+0x8c/0x4a0 fs/udf/inode.c:2171
>> udf_extend_file fs/udf/inode.c:677 [inline]
>> udf_setsize+0xa8a/0x1280 fs/udf/inode.c:1265
>> udf_setattr+0x3c7/0x5d0 fs/udf/file.c:236
>> notify_change+0xbca/0xe90 fs/attr.c:503
>> do_truncate fs/open.c:65 [inline]
>> do_ftruncate+0x46b/0x590 fs/open.c:181
>> do_sys_ftruncate fs/open.c:199 [inline]
>> __do_sys_ftruncate fs/open.c:207 [inline]
>> __se_sys_ftruncate fs/open.c:205 [inline]
>> __x64_sys_ftruncate+0x95/0xf0 fs/open.c:205
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>> RIP: 0033:0x7f13639ac249
>> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>> RSP: 002b:00007fff0302d508 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004d
>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f13639ac249
>> RDX: 00007f13639ac249 RSI: 0000008002007ffb RDI: 0000000000000005
>> RBP: 00000000000013f1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff0302d550
>> R13: 00007fff0302d630 R14: 431bde82d7b634db R15: 00007f13639f501d
>>
>> The root cause is:
>> udf_extend_file
>> ->inode_bmap --> etype == -1 and epos.bh == NULL
>> -> udf_next_aext --> return -1 because reading block failed
>> -> sb_read --> return NULL because access beyond end of device
>>
>> Under this, etype == -1, epos.bh == NULL, epos.offset is 24, which is
>> less than sizeof(struct extentedFileEntry), aka 216. As a result,
>> it skipped the epos.bh check and goes into udf_next_aext(). Since the
>> epos.offset is illegal, udf_get_filelongad's first argument ptr,
>> ptr = iinfo->i_data + epos->offset -
>> udf_file_entry_alloc_offset(inode) +
>> iinfo->i_lenEAttr;
>> points to some buffer before iinfo->i_data, which triggeres KASAN's
>> warnning.
>>
>> The fix is to add addition check on etype, epos.bh and epos.offset,
>> when ftruncate accesses beyound end of device, just return EIO and failed.
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+7a4842f0b1801230a989@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7a4842f0b1801230a989
>> Tested-by: syzbot+7a4842f0b1801230a989@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn>
> Thanks for the analysis and the patch! I agree this will fix the problem
> for the particular syzbot reproducer but I think a proper solution needs a
> bit more. I think we need udf_current_aext() and udf_next_aext() to
> differentiate between error and "hit EOF" - I think they can take pointer
> to etype to store the extent type and just return 0 on success, <0 on
> error. Then inode_bmap() can do the same and udf_extend_file() can properly
> detect errors and bail out without resorting to checking for particular
> offsets and assuming internal behavior of these functions. Will you be
> interested in looking into this?
>
> Honza
>
>
>> ---
>> fs/udf/inode.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
>> index 4726a4d014b6..66f73f728dae 100644
>> --- a/fs/udf/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
>> @@ -660,6 +660,16 @@ static int udf_extend_file(struct inode *inode, loff_t newsize)
>> udf_discard_prealloc(inode);
>>
>> etype = inode_bmap(inode, first_block, &epos, &eloc, &elen, &offset);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * when ftruncate attempt to access beyond end of device, sb_read will
>> + * fail with epos.bh be null and return etype be -1, just return EIO.
>> + */
>> + if (etype == -1 && !epos.bh && epos.offset == sizeof(struct allocExtDesc)) {
>> + err = -EIO;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> within_last_ext = (etype != -1);
>> /* We don't expect extents past EOF... */
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(within_last_ext &&
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
Thanks for the review! You suggestion is great and I am glad to have a try.
ps: I am new on udf module, so this may takes some time, wishes finishing it ASAP.:)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists