[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240913152621.GW4723@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:26:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] perf: Introduce deferred user callchains
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 07:47:14AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Or if it would instead make sense to combine all the deferred user
> options into a single variable length PERF_RECORD_USER_DEFERRED event
> type?
This, have all those samples refer to the same future user callchain.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists