[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAfSe-vQCG=RRGwxEEWR-HE5LGH4XniMWi=nTzOOQMrW_fvRUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:41:15 +0800
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhangchunyan@...as.ac.cn>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/mm: skip virtual_address_range tests on riscv
Hi Charlie,
On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 11:22, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:26:35AM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> > RISC-V doesn't currently have the behavior of restricting the virtual
> > address space which virtual_address_range tests check, this will
> > cause the tests fail. So lets disable the whole test suite for riscv64
> > for now, not build it and run_vmtests.sh will skip it if it is not present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhangchunyan@...as.ac.cn>
>
> Which tree does this apply onto? It is failing to apply on -rc7. Also,
Oh, it applies to -rc1.
> since this is the second version of this patch it is good practice to
> put v2 in the subject like [PATCH v2 2/2]. Anyways, the content of this
> patch looks good!
>
> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Thanks,
Chunyan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists