[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac93f995-09bc-4d2c-8159-6afbfbac0598@paulmck-laptop>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:00:39 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [BUG almost bisected] Splat in dequeue_rt_stack() and build error
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 06:55:34PM +0200, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 13/09/24 07:08, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 09:32:18AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>
> >> Just following up...
> >>
> >> For whatever it is worth, on last night's run of next-20240906, I got
> >> nine failures out of 100 6-hour runs of rcutorture’s TREE03 scenario.
> >> These failures were often, but not always, shortly followed by a hard hang.
> >>
> >> The warning at line 1995 is the WARN_ON_ONCE(on_dl_rq(dl_se))
> >> in enqueue_dl_entity() and the warning at line 1971 is the
> >> WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node)) in __enqueue_dl_entity().
> >>
> >> The pair of splats is shown below, in case it helps.
> >
> > Again following up...
> >
> > I am still seeing this on next-20240912, with six failures out of 100
> > 6-hour runs of rcutorture’s TREE03 scenario. Statistics suggests that
> > we not read much into the change in frequency.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any diagnostic patches or options that
> > I should apply.
>
> Hey, sorry I haven't forgotten about this, I've just spread myself a bit
> too thin and also apparently I'm supposed to prepare some slides for next
> week, I'll get back to this soonish.
I know that feeling! Just didn't want it to get lost.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists