[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuSB9UzlHLKEnag3@pollux>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:18:29 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>, Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@...il.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Fix dynamic job-flow control race
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 09:53:25AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> Fixes a race condition reported here: https://github.com/AsahiLinux/linux/issues/309#issuecomment-2238968609
Good catch! Please add a 'Closes' tag with this link.
>
> The whole premise of lockless access to a single-producer-single-
> consumer queue is that there is just a single producer and single
> consumer. That means we can't call drm_sched_can_queue() (which is
> about queueing more work to the hw, not to the spsc queue) from
> anywhere other than the consumer (wq).
>
> This call in the producer is just an optimization to avoid scheduling
> the consuming worker if it cannot yet queue more work to the hw. It
> is safe to drop this optimization to avoid the race condition.
>
> Suggested-by: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
> Fixes: a78422e9dff3 ("drm/sched: implement dynamic job-flow control")
You may want to explicitly CC stable.
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index ab53ab486fe6..1af1dbe757d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -1020,8 +1020,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_cleanup);
> void drm_sched_wakeup(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
> struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
Please also remove the entity parameter. For the other refactoring, I agree it
should be in a different patch.
With that,
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Thanks for fixing this.
- Danilo
> {
> - if (drm_sched_can_queue(sched, entity))
> - drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
> + drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.46.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists