[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuSFUQPp0BdcFpx9@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 21:32:49 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Parker Newman <parker@...est.io>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Parker Newman <pnewman@...necttech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] misc: eeprom: eeprom_93cx6: Add quirk for extra
read clock cycle
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 02:24:20PM -0400, Parker Newman wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:48:03 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:55:38AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote:
...
> > > Link: https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/Atmel-5193-SEEPROM-AT93C46D-Datasheet.pdf
> >
> > Make it a tag (i.e. locate just above your SoB tag)
>
> Sorry, not 100% sure what you mean by tag? Do I just need to move the Link: entry
> to be above my Sign-off? Or is there something else? Thanks!
Make it like
...Summary...
<blank line>
...commit message text...
<blank line>
Link: ...
Signed-off-by: ...
...
> > > + if (has_quirk_extra_read_cycle(eeprom)) {
> > > + eeprom_93cx6_pulse_high(eeprom);
> >
> > No additional delay is needed?
>
> Should not need any extra delay as both pulse high/low functions have the worst case
> 450ns delay after the register write. It was working well on my test cards.
OK!
> > > + eeprom_93cx6_pulse_low(eeprom);
> > > + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists