lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240913044304.GB2825852@ZenIV>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:43:04 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:26:31PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

> Should I take out the following from bpf-next/for-next for now?
> 
> a8e40fd0f127 ("Merge branch 'bpf-next/struct_fd' into for-next")
> 
> Al, currently I'm basing my patches on top of your stable-struct_fd
> branch. If you need to update it, I think that's fine, I can rebase on
> top of the updated branch, given my patches weren't yet merged
> anywhere. Let me know.

al@...e:~/linux/trees/temp$ git describe for-next 
v6.11-rc1-3-gde12c3391bce
al@...e:~/linux/trees/temp$ git describe stable-struct_fd 
v6.11-rc1-3-gde12c3391bce

IOW, #for-next is currently identical to that branch (will grow a merge
shortly); no need to rebase anything.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ