[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e1594f5-7134-4210-a232-2fb1595d2166@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:48:24 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen
Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
<quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add compatible for
QCM6490 boards
On 8/17/2024 2:51 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/08/2024 10:32, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Add the new QCM6490 compatible to support the reset functionality for
>> Low Power Audio subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>
> Subject is odd - I do not see here anything related to boards.
>
> Anyway, this is incomplete. Look at the rest of the binding - you did
> not update any part related to proper clock constraints.
>
Not sure if I understand the concern, but I was of the opinion that I
have added a new compatible for QCM6490 board , but no new clock
constraint added.
I see a patch from you
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240817094605.27185-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
and I guess it fixes the constraints.
Please help with your comments further.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists