linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: pci_call_probe: call local_pci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H4KAnqCFDQ8Lg=9jBdQ3CNOLU8CKe8_7Px4VCmgKG_b5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:06:28 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@...ux.intel.com>, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>, 
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>, 
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, 
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: pci_call_probe: call local_pci_probe() when
 selected cpu is offline

Ping?

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:05 PM Hongchen Zhang
<zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> On 2024/7/24 下午2:40, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> > On 7/24/2024 11:09 AM, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
> >> Hi Ethan,
> >>
> >> On 2024/7/24 上午10:47, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> >>> On 7/24/2024 9:58 AM, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
> >>>> Hi Ethan,
> >>>> On 2024/7/22 PM 3:39, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 6/13/2024 3:42 PM, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
> >>>>>> Call work_on_cpu(cpu, fn, arg) in pci_call_probe() while the argument
> >>>>>> @cpu is a offline cpu would cause system stuck forever.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This can be happen if a node is online while all its CPUs are
> >>>>>> offline (We can use "maxcpus=1" without "nr_cpus=1" to reproduce it).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, in the above case, let pci_call_probe() call local_pci_probe()
> >>>>>> instead of work_on_cpu() when the best selected cpu is offline.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 69a18b18699b ("PCI: Restrict probe functions to
> >>>>>> housekeeping CPUs")
> >>>>>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> v2 -> v3: Modify commit message according to Markus's suggestion
> >>>>>> v1 -> v2: Add a method to reproduce the problem
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>   drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 2 +-
> >>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> >>>>>> index af2996d0d17f..32a99828e6a3 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> >>>>>> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver
> >>>>>> *drv, struct pci_dev *dev,
> >>>>>>           free_cpumask_var(wq_domain_mask);
> >>>>>>       }
> >>>>>> -    if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why not choose the right cpu to callwork_on_cpu() ? the one that is
> >>>>> online. Thanks, Ethan
> >>>> Yes, let housekeeping_cpumask() return online cpu is a good idea,
> >>>> but it may be changed by command line. so the simplest way is to
> >>>> call local_pci_probe when the best selected cpu is offline.
> >>>
> >>> Hmm..... housekeeping_cpumask() should never return offline CPU, so
> >>> I guess you didn't hit issue with the CPU isolation, but the following
> >>> code seems not good.
> >> The issue is the dev node is online but the best selected cpu is
> >> offline, so it seems that there is no better way to directly set the
> >> cpu to nr_cpu_ids.
> >
> > I mean where the bug is ? you should debug more about that.
> > just add one cpu_online(cpu) check there might suggest there
> > is bug in the cpu selection stage.
> >
> >
> > if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node) ||
> >          pci_physfn_is_probed(dev)) {
> >          cpu = nr_cpu_ids; // <----- if you hit here, then
> > local_pci_probe() should be called.
> >      } else {
> >          cpumask_var_t wq_domain_mask;
> >
> >          if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&wq_domain_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> >              error = -ENOMEM;
> >              goto out;
> >          }
> >          cpumask_and(wq_domain_mask,
> >                  housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_WQ),
> >                  housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN));
> >
> >          cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(node),
> >                        wq_domain_mask);
> >          free_cpumask_var(wq_domain_mask);
> >                  // <----- if you hit here, then work_on_cpu(cpu,
> > local_pci_probe, &ddi) should be called.
> Yes, but if the offline cpu is selected, local_pci_probe should be called.
> >                  // do you mean there one offline cpu is selected ?
> Yes, the offline cpu is selected.
> >
> >      }
> >
> >      if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> >          error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
> >      else
> >          error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ethan
> >
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>> if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node) ||
> >>>          pci_physfn_is_probed(dev)) {
> >>>          cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
> >>>      } else {
> >>>
> >>> ....
> >>>
> >>> perhaps you could change the logic there and fix it  ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Ethan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +    if ((cpu < nr_cpu_ids) && cpu_online(cpu))
> >>>>>>           error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
> >>>>>>       else
> >>>>>>           error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Hongchen Zhang
>
>