[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuQJ8aGqrF_eMVEH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:46:25 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the arm-soc
tree
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:10:38PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024, at 07:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/vision_ep9307.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 3e0bae7f35c9 ("ARM: ep93xx: delete all boardfiles")
> >
> > from the arm-soc tree and commits:
> >
> > 4b2b0a2ce815 ("gpiolib: legacy: Kill GPIOF_INIT_* definitions")
> > 8c045ca534d0 ("gpiolib: legacy: Kill GPIOF_DIR_* definitions")
> >
> > from the gpio-brgl tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I removed the file)
>
> Looks good, thanks,
Confirmed from my side, thanks.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists