[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SN6PR03MB4320EC2760F85BB6B0DDEED4F3652@SN6PR03MB4320.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:06:48 +0000
From: "Nechita, Ramona" <Ramona.Nechita@...log.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
"Tanislav, Cosmin" <Cosmin.Tanislav@...log.com>,
"Hennerich, Michael"
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Sa,
Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
David Lechner
<dlechner@...libre.com>,
"Schmitt, Marcelo" <Marcelo.Schmitt@...log.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Dumitru Ceclan
<mitrutzceclan@...il.com>,
Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@...il.com>,
João Paulo Gonçalves <joao.goncalves@...adex.com>,
Alisa-Dariana Roman <alisadariana@...il.com>,
Mike Looijmans
<mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 2/3] Documentation: ABI: added filter mode doc in
sysfs-bus-iio
>>
>> The filter mode / filter type property is used for ad4130 and ad7779
>> drivers, therefore the ABI doc file for ad4130 was removed, merging
>> both of them in the sysfs-bus-iio.
>
>...
>
>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/filter_type_available
>> +What: /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:deviceX/in_voltage-voltage_filter_mode_available
>> +KernelVersion: 6.1
>
>I believe I have already commented on this. The commit message keeps silent about version changes. Why?
I mentioned it in the cover-letter, since the attributes of two devices were merged, and one of them was available in 6.1 ad the other in 6.2, it felt appropriate to leave it as 6.1.
I was wondering if this is ok or if it should be kept as 6.2. Should this be mentioned in the commit message as well?
>
>> +Contact: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
>> +Description:
>> + Reading returns a list with the possible filter modes. Options
>> + for the attribute:
>> + * "sinc3" - The digital sinc3 filter. Moderate 1st conversion time.
>> + Good noise performance.
>> + * "sinc4" - Sinc 4. Excellent noise performance. Long
>> + 1st conversion time.
>> + * "sinc5" - The digital sinc5 filter. Excellent noise performance
>> + * "sinc4+sinc1" - Sinc4 + averaging by 8. Low 1st conversion
>> + time.
>> + * "sinc3+rej60" - Sinc3 + 60Hz rejection.
>> + * "sinc3+sinc1" - Sinc3 + averaging by 8. Low 1st conversion
>> + time.
>> + * "sinc3+pf1" - Sinc3 + device specific Post Filter 1.
>> + * "sinc3+pf2" - Sinc3 + device specific Post Filter 2.
>> + * "sinc3+pf3" - Sinc3 + device specific Post Filter 3.
>> + * "sinc3+pf4" - Sinc3 + device specific Post Filter 4.
>
>Also, the original file was more verbose for the complex cases, like "sinc3+pfX", why has this been changed?
Since this is a more generic file I was advised to leave out specific details, should I include them just as they were in the original file?
--
Best Regards,
Ramona
Powered by blists - more mailing lists